Improving with kawak®

To date, there is no option of being able to inherit those maintenance pending to be executed

When inheriting commitments, the “user inheritance” function is completely fulfilled, however, not only do they require that the commitments pending to be made be inherited, but there is also the possibility of massively changing those responsible for each task of the solutions when disabling the user or when making a change of position. When a user changes position, their commitments are inherited by another person, however, if this person was responsible for an indicator, document, improvement opportunity, etc.; the change must be made manually. A similar case occurs when a user is disabled, there should be a way to assign their future responsibilities to another person without having to enter one by one to make the change.

the environmental matrix must define an inherent risk and a residual risk after applying existing controls. For medium or high residual risks, an action plan must be defined, subject to annual monitoring. The idea of the improvement is that automatically from the risk module, a specific and independent environmental matrix is created, from the company's unified and integrated risk matrix, and brings significant, critical and moderate environmental impacts from the environmental module, to assess the inherent risk, apply existing controls and calculate a residual risk

for the news section, it would be good to be able to view it in a similar way to how the kawak® tips panel looks, since the news is currently displayed as if it were a list, that is, vertically. It is more an aesthetic consideration than a functional one.

The improvement presented is to include in the Continuous Improvement Module in Type of Cause Analysis, the methodology of the 5 because.

Good day As a suggestion, the commitments of the continuous improvement module are proposed in the commitment bulletin that is issued weekly.

Please include, within the module, configurations for creating dependencies and positions. Include a field that allows you to register the operations center, by selecting the city to which the position and the user belong. This would facilitate proper organizational identification and would strengthen information management.

The recurrence option is not mandatory and, like R1, the drop-down list of the indicator family is added, so that at the time of exporting it, it brings us the analysis.

Good day, I thank you for your support in the fact that scheduled or pending maintenance can be inherited from the equipment module, also from the action plans of the verification module

By including additional fields in any module, it would be great if they could be viewed in the “grid”, that is, on the main screen, and in the same way that they can be exported in reports. Otherwise, the “additional fields” are only informational within each form, but then we can't see the information in bulk